Calendar

<<  September 2008  >>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

View posts in large calendar

Recent posts

Recent comments

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008

Sign in

Who’s a Nerd, Anyway?

by HyperbolicHyperbally 7/29/2007 1:33:00 PM

An, essay appeared in the New York Times Magazine linking neediness to the rejection of African American culture. A woman out in California spent 12 year trying to pin down the common nerds and what makes them be. During a year of painstaking fieldwork she studied the nerd in their semi-natural environment, a large San Fransisco Bay High School. One time she asked female student(a "girl" to the layperson)to define the word blood and a shocking example of cultural rejection was uncovered. The student acted as if she was in the spelling bee by spelling the word B L O O D and then claimed that it was the substance flowing in her veins. When any normal person would know that it was the excepted word for friend.(I had never heard this definition, but as one with no culture, how would I have any knowledge of words or language?) Obviously she's was rejecting African American culture. It seems the conclusion was that nerds were "HyperWhite" and rejected the African American influence underpinning the "cool" white kids culture. The real kicker comes at the end:

By cultivating an identity perceived as white to the point of excess, nerds deny themselves the aura of normality that is usually one of the perks of being white. Bucholtz sees something to admire here. In declining to appropriate African-American youth culture, thereby “refusing to exercise the racial privilege upon which white youth cultures are founded,” she writes, nerds may even be viewed as “traitors to whiteness.” You might say they know that a culture based on theft is a culture not worth having.

I don't really have the words to describe the above, other than I was under the impression that nerds were shunned for their lack of social graces, not due to  consciously exercising their white privilege to reject the adoption of a non-culture stolen from the oppressed African American "youth". 

You can't make this stuff up. Honestly this the kind of stuff you ought to be reading in the Onion. I don't know how this stuff doesn't get laughed out off into the trash heap where it belongs, but then again I hear things look different from the Ivory Tower and that perhaps in some corner of the new math you can take nothing from something and end up nerds....

P.S. Also, if ever you feel the need to show your solidarity with the downtrodden African American youth, just drop the g's from the ends of words. Remember no other dialects of the non-languate English do this, only the African American version does.

Hat Tips: TigerHawk and JustOneMinute

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Humor | Reviews

Related posts

Comments

2/10/2008 2:28:09 PM

Lord Cyclohexane

Here's the URL of the paper referenced in the above article:
www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/.../MB_JLA2001.pdf

Personally, I'm more offended by the flip side of Ms. Bucholtz's argument. One quality she ascribes to nerds is a penchant for following Standard English. Another, the avoidance of slang, instead preferring the usage of words with their direct, dictionary definition. She then takes these qualities and defines it as "hyperwhite." And that following such things is, equivalently, a rejection of African culture.

So, what does she tell us? That African-Americans *cannot*, or at the barest, *shouldn't* use proper English. She tells us that for a black person to use English properly is a rejection of black culture, and thus also, that a quality of black culture is the improper usage of the English language. In essence, she is saying that the ideal black individual is one who is completely unable to use proper English.

Thankfully, she doesn't go further to explain *why* the ideal black individual is unable to, whether said individual suffers from some biological quirk in the tongue or vocal cords preventing the pronunciation of words ending in "g" or whether there is some difference in structure in the auditory and lingual cortices of the brain that naturally short-circuit whenever contemplating the proper conjugations of the verb "to be" or some other psychological factor altogether. However, seeing as she describes "nerd" as "hyperwhite" and "intelligent" tends to be one of the qualities associated with "nerdiness", I think we can easily figure her meaning.

In summary, I find Ms. Bucholtz to be the worst type of racist. She, for whatever reason, claims that black people are less intelligent than whites, which is complete and utter bullshit. Further, I believe that she ought to be removed from the field of education, as her overall concept seems to suggest not only that she believes that black people are unable to learn at an equivalent level and do such things as use proper English, but that to be "racially tolerant" that *everyone* should similarly use sub-proper English lest they be rejecting her horribly racist view of black culture. In the end, she is insisting that everyone should use less-than-proper English, leading to a dumbing down of all students. Should someone like this really be allowed to work in the field of education? Someone who claims that not only can students not be taught, that they SHOULD NOT be taught? I personally do not believe so.

Lord Cyclohexane us

2/10/2008 2:38:23 PM

HypbolicHyperbally

If you check footnote #2 in the paper you linked; Ms. Bucholtz' is strictly limiting her thesis to only those people she considers "white". Since this paper is a study of "whiteness" (not adequately defined) she can completely ignore the other "races" (in quotes because it seems Ms. Bucholtz's is playing a little loose with the standard definition of the word) who are "nerds".

Now these "white" people seem to be further limited those who are considered to be successful by society. The proverbial majority often called "WASP"s. However, since the "Hillbillies" are disadvantaged "whites" and do not fit into the simplistic duality between the "White" oppressive, sterile overclass and the oppressed but creative African-American underclass.

Since the thesis only deals with white Nerd non-culture (since apparently your skin color decides whether your worthy of having a culture). We are left with a paper claiming that nerdiness is the rejection of blackness. However, I agree that the implications of this argument could lead to treating an African-American person acting "nerdy" as a traitor to his or her "race". In fact I'd argue she is reducing a sub-culture,"nerd" down to a racial category "SuperWhite", which I find both ridiculous and insulting. This redefinition causes one to see everything through the prism of race and once you start making value judgments regarding those races (such as the negative comments regarding the "hillbillie" race or the success of the Asian "model minorities" due to the "whites" giving them honorary "whiteness" (possibly removing their culture as well?) as opposed their own actions.), I can only label that person as a racist.

Basically this paper is complete B.S. and one would expect should expect better from a scholar at a prestigious university. This is something I'd expect to find written as a joke, ridiculing the often nonsensical conclusion often found in the racial(ist) studies departments. Perhapses it's more of an exercise in how to misuse and redefine the English language on the fly, since many words seem to imply different meaning from what is commonly known or even as a test to see if a such a racist paper would pass the censors. I guess this really is just a long response to LordCyclohexane's common on my previous post, so it's more an addendum than a proper sequal

HypbolicHyperbally us

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

9/6/2008 4:06:29 PM

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.3.0.0